Seven security domains on one live graph of assets, identities, vulnerabilities and controls, with an operating system that runs the work and people on the gates.
Experience the platform with sample data today. Connect your enterprise when you’re ready.
Follow a single threat from first exposure to final proof. At each moment an assembly is already working it, and the calls that carry risk to the business stay with a person.
Assets found, owned and rated before an attacker finds them.
Exposure ManagementExposures ranked by real risk and fixed at their source.
Exposure · Cloud & AppSignals correlated into cases, with benign noise closed and explained.
Detection & TriageThe blast radius traced across hosts, accounts and data.
Incident ResponseActions staged inside policy, with high-impact calls held for a person.
Response · IdentityThe record turned into a report and a control fix.
Incident ResponseEvidence and risk kept current for the auditor and the board.
Governance, Risk & ComplianceSecurity teams already run a SIEM, endpoint tools, identity systems, scanners and a GRC platform. Each is right about its own slice. The grid does not replace any of them; it resolves them into one live graph and runs the work that falls between them.
Assets, identities, vulnerabilities, alerts, configurations, vendors and controls resolved into a single live graph, each fact carrying its source and your security policy attached to it.
Twenty-one assemblies of AI agents run the work on that graph: triaging alerts, scoping incidents, ranking exposures, reviewing access and collecting evidence.
This is not another SIEM, scanner or ticketing tool. Nothing gets ripped out. The grid reads the tools you run, reasons over them, and does the work, policy-bound and traceable.
Autonomy is not one number. Each domain sits at its own point between machine-run and human-led, set by the nature of the work: highest where it is rule-bound volume, lowest where a single call can stop the business.
The human role: work the confirmed cases. Duplicate and benign alerts close with an explanation, and a real intrusion reaches an analyst with the evidence attached.
The human role: findings are found, ranked and routed on their own; the change to production stays with the owner, with the reason staged beside it.
The human role: reviews, monitoring and evidence collection run around the clock; each access removal, data decision, vendor call and risk acceptance waits for its named owner.
The human role: containment can disrupt the business as surely as an attacker can. Agents scope the incident, stage the options and price the disruption; the incident lead decides on the high-impact actions.
From the first asset discovered to the last control proven, each part of cyber security has a domain that owns it. Each domain runs as assemblies of AI agents and context APIs.
Each domain carries its own outcome KPIs. Rolled up, this is the direction the function moves.
Some calls do not run alone. These wait for a named person, with the evidence staged beside them:
Containment, access and exception decisions follow your policy in order, not a model’s best guess. Open any decision and walk the chain back to the source event.
Each agent holds the access its assembly needs and no more, and each action it takes is written to the graph with the policy that allowed it.
The same reasoning substrate is formalized in peer-reviewed research for aerospace competency management and runs tier-one banking operations.
Certified to SOC 2 and ISO 27001, with an independent bias audit, and built for the transparency that regimes such as the EU AI Act now require.
Each autonomous action and each human approval lands on the same graph, so an auditor queries the trail instead of reconstructing it.
A flood of alerts, a stale backlog, an audit coming due. Pick the flow that hurts and walk it on the grid, with your data as the use case.